Chyna has no reason to sue the UK over the attempt to save the steel plant after the no-mark previous owner - a jobbing builder company who liked to make their own RSJs - ran it into the ground. The people who worked there warned Parliament over and over again.
So, perhaps we should stand up and say to Chyna..... go away. Exactly the conversation that would take place if the roles were swapped.
I waite with baited breath, Burnham has got the whole summer to get to grips firmly on the tiller. No excuses for U-turns or anything else that goes wrong. I suggest we all batten down the hatches as making big bold statements about what he want to achieve gives ground hog day scenarios.
Chyna has no reason to sue the UK over the attempt to save the steel plant after the no-mark previous owner - a jobbing builder company who liked to make their own RSJs - ran it into the ground. The people who worked there warned Parliament over and over again.
So, perhaps we should stand up and say to Chyna..... go away. Exactly the conversation that would take place if the roles were swapped.
This article should be saved for posterity and reposted in six months that’s if he hasn’t done too much damage by then.
You are much too young to remember who the original Andy Pandy was.
I waite with baited breath, Burnham has got the whole summer to get to grips firmly on the tiller. No excuses for U-turns or anything else that goes wrong. I suggest we all batten down the hatches as making big bold statements about what he want to achieve gives ground hog day scenarios.
Actions speak louder than an avalanche of platitudes. Just wait until he is told how much fiscal headroom there ISN'T.