What are we being 'prepared' for, exactly?

If an emergency is imminent, and the greatest threat is Islamism, why is The Establishment seemingly actively enabling it?

I’m going to offer this long read for free, in the hope that more people who can read my work may be encouraged to support it. I want to be able to make more content and give more people the truth.

Please consider fully subscribing. Thank you.

Alarm bells are ringing

At 3pm on Sunday 7th September an emergency siren will blare out of mobile phones across the UK.

The chilling tone of the alert system is purportedly being tested in preparation for warning people of danger to life nearby, particularly outbreaks of extreme weather.

Wait. What?!

Last time I checked the UK wasn't exactly in a hurricane belt.

In fact, here's the Met Office's own map of extreme weather danger zones.

What constitutes extreme weather in the UK has always been, and pretty much still is, when the school dinner ladies bellow 'It's spitting!’ and proceed to herd a rabble of feral kids from the playground inside.

A field in Essex sizzling under the summer sun because Carl's discarded bottle of Corona has torched a patch of frazzled grass does not require every citizen from Inverness to Portsmouth to be subjected to potential cardiac arrest as their phones spontaneously squawk apocalypse.

So what is the siren and it’s ability to allow the state to directly set off our devices really all about?

Answers on a postcard, please.

France on War Footing

Meanwhile, a leaked letter in France sent to regional health agencies exposes that the Ministry of Health has told hospitals across the country to prepare for a “major (military) engagement” by March 2026.

It suggests that between 10,000 and 50,000 men could require urgent treatment over a period of 10 to 180 days.

The leaked document states

“In the current international context, it is necessary to anticipate the modalities of health support in situations of high-intensity conflict,”

When asked about the existence of the instruction, Health Minister Catherine Vautrin told journalists

“It's part of preparation, like strategic stockpiles, like epidemics. I wasn't in office at the time of Covid-19, remember, there were no words harsh enough to describe the country's lack of preparedness”

OK. I can buy that. The pandemic caught almost all countries napping and we live in an increasingly tense world.

The letter, dated 18th July, allegedly states that France could form the rear guard for a large-scale conflict in coming months. Where? Against whom?

This latest dystopian exposé lands mere months after France also revealed plans to send a ‘survival manual’ to every household. What are they preparing to survive?

And France is not alone.

The EU wants its citizens to start stockpiling items for a '72-hour survival kit' while in Germany, the government is telling teachers to start preparing children for war.

Of course the anticipated doom is focused around Russia suddenly deciding to march into Europe with tanks and jets and nukes and force an entire continent into subservience.

Now, don't get me wrong, and I really don't think Putin should be underestimated AT ALL, but let's have a look at how war between Nato and Russia would pan out, shall we?

And that's without Russia haemorraghing arms and troops in a war of attrition with Ukraine which everyone expected them to wrap up years ago, even without the EU being a dithering, impotent mess in response.

No. The real risk lies on home soil.

It is still Islamic Terrorism

Far more likely, in my view, is the potential for a coordinated terror attack replicating multiple October 7ths across European capitals at the hands of thousands of sleeper cells of Islamists who have been flagrantly fed into Western Europe via terrorist traffickers, along, potentially, with caches of weapons dropped over the sides of dinghies into the sea - a subterfuge logistical tactic used by Hamas to smuggle arms and munitions into Gaza.

I have written before of a source telling me that Mossad has informed MI6 that hundreds of Jihadist trainers are already in Britain via illegal routes.

And informed my subscribers of leaked French and EU security reports exposing fears of how Islamists are planning to conquer Europe. Funnily enough, another ‘leak’. Perhaps someone somewhere is trying to get the message out there.

And perhaps even more chillingly, the warnings from ex-CIA agents and OSINT accounts over the second iteration of Al Qaeda's potential mass casualties strategy.

The likelihood of civil war or domestic attacks stemming from carefully planned and murderously executed Islamist terrorism seems far, far more plausible than Putin waging an invasion against a defensive bloc that outguns and outstrips his kinetic and manpower forces by at least 2 to 1, when he hasn't even been able to conquer an underarmed and under-prepared Ukraine for the past 2 years. Putin is attacking us already in many ways, including being part of the illegal mass migratory flows from largely Muslim countries into Western Europe.

The political establishment and intelligence agencies must know this. So why are they sitting on their hands?

The 5th Column

They make all the right noises over threats from Russia. So why is it that so many disastrous policies actually seem to enable and enhance the threats from Islamism while gaslighting us that it doesn’t exist?

Now, it would make sense to me that the agencies et al would choose to not publicise fears over impending terror attacks, even though once upon a time they seemed dead keen on regularly providing traffic light risk reports, for fear of stirring tensions that would potentially become the catalyst for them. We are already on the verge of members of the public beginning by vigilante ‘defensive’ action against Muslim communities. We are already seeing calls for Muslim remigration. There is little breathing time left. There are plenty of very angry Europeans ready to take matters into their own hands at this point. Which would spark reprisals. And disaster.

That may even explain why they go as far as rendering even the discussion of fears over Islamism and terrorism in the public square increasingly taboo. Perhaps they think we are all safer and saner if we just will it away.

It is doubtless why there has been a modus operandi of a soft approach to ugly Pro-Palestine marches, to despicable Islamist protests from the Batley School Teacher to the Manchester Airport Thugs. Don't poke the bear in the zoo appears to be the thought process.

But the thing is, the bear is sharpening its claws anyway.

The Phenomenon of the Beefcake Islamist

Across Europe, including here in the UK, Islamic ‘training camps' are openly advertising their programmes.

Looking at this video below, it is hard to equate this to a Christian Summer Camp where little kids sing Kumbaya and weave crosses out of straw.

That's not to say Muslims can't all hang out together and get fit, but it certainly freaks the heck out of the Islamophobe in me. (I'm appropriating the word as I am scared of Islamism, which makes me a very very normal person, and not a bigot.)

Similarly, in The Hague in The Netherlands, an Islamic ‘sports group’ going by the name of “Full Force” is advertising for recruits across social media by explicitly calling itself an ‘army’ preparing to ‘take over the world.’

The influencer Enes Kürşat - or ‘EKanon’ on TikTok and Instagram, regularly posts videos showing strength training and what look like military-style drills accompanied by verses from the Quran, while calling on soldiers to join an army of brothers.

As the Old adage goes, when someone shows you who they are - believe them.

Deaf, dumb…or deliberate?

But it is the Western response to the logically and patently obvious threat of Islam that is the most bewildering.

Instead of defending its citizens against enemy threats, the police and political establishment treat the citizens as the enemy.

They appear to provoke us, by arresting normal people for ordinary views, from Graham Linehan to Lucy Connolly to the Epping Forest ladies, while gaslighting us over a very rational, very sane fear of future terror attacks, while cars plough into crowds and a sick boy with an Al Qaeda manual tries to decapitate a classroom of girls in Southport while making ricin at home. Not only are they funding the sort of unhinged leftist organisations such as Hope Not Hate that brainwash society into believing that a perfectly understandable concern ovef a known threat is actually abject racism, while demonising any politician or public figure that dares to simply acknowledge reality, they are pushing to enshrine in law the crime of being scared of Islam.

Make no mistake, they will arrest you one day for thinking a man with a massive beard shouting Allahu Akbar while waving an ISIS flag might pose danger to the community.

What I can't remotely fathom is why.

Western Governments could stop the illegal migratory flows. If they really wanted to.

The UK government could refuse to import tens of thousands of Afghans secretly, whatever is said about a data leak. If they wanted to.

Illegals who have broken into the country could easily be slammed into detention centres rather than scattered around cities and towns, giving them hotels our houses on your street. That's normal practice around the world. If they wanted to.

They can write laws to ban the Burqa, monitor mosques, proscribe Islamist organisations and defend against terrorism as multiple Muslim nations already do. If they wanted to.

Yes, yes, international treaties. Revoke them. Be sovereign. Defend yourself. Like most other nations on earth. It could be done. If they wanted to.

But they are not.

Instead they are importing more and more fighting aged men from unstable Islamic regimes while bending over backwards to accommodate more and more explicitly Islamist practices on their own soil.

But the British are waking up to this extraordinary madness despite having been psy-opped for decades to become immune to reality.

And so there lies the most patent and prevalent threat across the West. And we are being gaslit into thinking we're the ones who are in the wrong to see that.

I have already written a post about Professor David Betz’s assertions on the risk of civil war in Britain at the start of this year

Well, Betz’s former colleague Michael Rainsborough, now lecturing in Australia having been harried out of academia by the usual Marxist masters, has very recently come out to profess that the ‘Britain's Descent Towards Civil War Is No Accident.’

He writes

“The record of intentionality, in fact, is undeniable. Under Tony Blair, the Labour government pursued a policy of demographic transformation… It was an explicit goal, and its consequences are now written across Britain’s social fabric. Likewise, the current Labour leadership under Sir Keir Starmer operates from a post-nationalist outlook, one that treats the very idea of nationhood as negotiable, even alien, to the political class.”

What is still not clear is how organised or organic this plummeting into suicidal empathy has been.

Does it stem from radical student Marxists in the 1960s today now holding positions of power? An inevitable metastisisation of cultural cancer that was not effectively excised and has gone on to infect all organs of the state?

That was a potential conclusion from my research into The Fabian Society

Or is it a powerful, audacious, aggressive and organised effort to destroy The West for reasons that are psychologically hard to fathom for the average socialised person?

Because if it’s bleedingly obvious to the Average Joe how the Government should be responding to this threat, it is breathtakingly bonkers to begin to wonder why they are not.

This is the real bar of soap in the shower, and seemingly impossible to answer.

Yet answer we must. Because unless we can understand and so root out and destroy the canker that is slowly killing the planet's most successful civilisation, we will be powerless to prevent it.